Still, more than 25 years working experience, cannot get used to those senior level's non-sense decision. No matter they are younger than me or not, that 'something' behind is obvious, but as it will not be spilled out from anyone's mouth, it turned out to be non-sense.
For a project, if there is a change on schedule, no matter to shorten or lengthen, still need a reason. It will jeopardize the project somehow. That's the reason for the exist of PMO. Literally, it regulate and formulate how a project will run to a success for a company. What senior management thought, it is a tool for controlling the way that juniors work. So the truth is, senior levels did not care any regulations in there if they have a decision.
I know, where the heck is fairness, right? Honestly, it does not exist. Especially in a huge conglomerate. For any small potato, voice out equals end of your life span in that office. And it turns out that, working level small potatos, need to adopt every single era of management level change. If you are going to survive in the same office for a longer period, this is really frustrating. If you are a contract staff, the length of tolerance period is relatively shorter, good for you.
Cannot act what it is right, especially when a man in the mid-age. Overloaded burden, pressure, and all related stuff... the only way to survive is to compromise, though it is not a mutual consent. You know what I am saying.
Good luck.
No comments:
Post a Comment